Did Lord Krishna actually die out of an arrow wound or was it a Heart Attack…

To think about it, Krishna (Lets call him Krish from now on) was a major Makhan (Butter) hogger from childhood, well if you look at butter (Per 100 Gms) for food value one finds that it is rich with Fat (51 g), Trans Fat (30 g), cholesterol (215 mg), calories (717 KCal), protein (Just 1 g) man the perfect recipe for a good cholesterol filled heart attack. He was someone who was always into these stuff, now let us imagine that a normal human being grows up by eating a lot of butter and related fatty stuff, he is expected to grow up as someone with a lot of cholesterol, simple reason being the lifestyle defect…

Now if all this holds true then Krish must have accumulated a lot of cholesterol in his arteries and hence when the complete Yadav clan was being destroyed and he was running away form it he possibly had a heart attack and had collapsed behind a tree and subsequently died there…how ever I do not refute the fact that a hunter had shot Krish’s foot…but the reason for his death perhaps was heart attack and not the arrow shot, well no autopsy was performed on him to conclusively claim the cause of death…

Secondly Krish has always been depicted blue which is generally true for people with weak hearts (Please read up Blue Babies) well so my take is that he possibly died out of an heart attack…

Love

JD

If there is hell any where then it is HERE Here here….

The concept of heaven and hell is beautiful but both of them are present right here and currently I am facing hell…its for my sins….I am sure….

The sin of gluttony has made me fat and now I need to sweat it out if I need to look fit again…and trust me the gym is no where less than hell and the gym trainers no less than the devil who torture you and make you toil and your fat boil and one also needs to refrain from other pleasures of life like Wine and Junk food…it is I think the punishment one gets for gluttony and I am facing every bit of it… with the hope that after this hard work and all that I would be eligible for Heaven … which would be some nice junk food, daru and other nice fattening stuff…..

Reflecting

JD

Racism might have started in India…and the victor always writes the history

If you have read the history closely you would have noticed that there are 3 races in India, Aryans, Dravidians and the Mongoloids… now try understanding what had happened when the Aryans had invaded India, the Dravidians who were living in the north were pushed down south and as a result had to live on trees for shelter till they built the cities in the south, now look at the physical appearance of a typical Dravidian he is short, dark , large forehead, thick lips which is typically how the rakshasha  has been described and they were also tree top dwellers…

 

Now coming to the description of a devata he was tall, fair, small forehead, lived on the hills and cold places (Typically North of India)….looking at this one can comfortably say that our forefathers “The Aryans” had won the war and had written the history and also the moral textbooks…there they comfortably described the poor fallen Dravidians as the villainous rakshashas…

  

Introspectically speaking if Ravan had defeated Ram we would be living in a totally different society with a different moral fiber and also perhaps Ram as a villain Ravan as a hero and Sita…un imaginable …what she would be called…now this can also be applied to Mahabharat and any good epic…..

  

See the victor always writes the history and makes himself the hero and he many a times sparks up a story based on racism if the war was between 2 different races and that is what happened in India thousands of years ago…

 

 

JD  

Patriot or Just Plain Rot

I have in the past already posted my views of the sheer lack of sense of responsibility of the media, looking on the fact that they do not know what to print as news and what to filter out as a need for national security… but the reason for today’s post is not the media but a top ranking nuclear scientist who lacks the sense of patriotism…

 

I am surprised he worked as a part of a team that made India a formidable power back then and he is releasing statements that might compromise the security of the nation, well that does not sound as a patriot… something that should interest everyone of us is the fact that he comes back more than 10 years later to blow the whistle and what a whistle he blows…

 

Frankly if I was heading a hostile nation I would surely look at this as a nice reason to attack…. After all according to him our H-Bomb is a dud…

 

I am surprised at the press to first irresponsibly go ahead and print it as NEWS and then the government for not trying him under POTA.

 

Statesman

JD

Work Life or Sex Life

 

Just a few days ago a colleague of mine was discussing how BAD Mr. Silvio Berlusconi was, you know his sex scandal and all that. This bit of discussion actually made me think about a few things; I remember Bill Clinton Scandal (If you would like to call it one) and then other so called sex scandals of various political leaders; are these actually worth wasting our time upon.

 

Frankly I do not find a reason as to why there is such a mess about it….surely the public elects the political leader to run the country, so our problem should be is he doing a good job at that and not how is he running his Dick….

 

Well what he does or how he uses his dick should not be our concern as long as he is running the country properly and not involved in any scams…I am sure what he does in his bedroom has no synergy with what he does in his office…

 

As a closing statement all I want to say is that the Italians should be proud of their PM, reason is quite simple…it is the most prosperous European nation and he is running it efficiently, he is 75 years old and still manages to have such hot young women in his bed…he should be an international icon, a man who has balanced his work life balance perfectly, yet we are busy criticizing him on what he is doing….this make me wonder, is it because people are jealous of him, so they are criticizing him…then it is a classic case of ‘Sour Grapes’.

 

By the way Italians are good looking… The Italian women are hot, we have good example in India…and their PM has busted the myth of French as good lovers…looks like the Italians are doing an amazing job

 

 

Love

JD

Are we over stretching Democracy

 

One can define democracy as a form of government which is elected by the people for the people and to the people …in short People’s Government.

 

Now with this comes a lot of privileges, stuff like right to elect, right to speech, right to assemble, right to protest etc. but somewhere down the line we seem to have mistaken the basic underlying principle of democracy. It is there so that no one faces problems but the right to protest has slowly become right to riot.

 

I am more than sure that in democracy one can always object and oppose but has no right whatsoever to deface public property in the name of protests or use brute force method to impress one’s beliefs onto another individual. Democracy provides us with the power of agreeing to disagree. Your question as a reader I am sure would be what am I trying to arrive at….

 

Lets see….I found many a times that people resort to rioting during protests or rallies or dharnas…to this the best our police can do is use water cannons or at the most lathi charge….but you are doing this to a crowd which is burning busses, throwing petrol bombs etc. don’t you think all these are acts of terrorism and they at that point in time need to be treated as terrorists…go ahead guys shoot them…sounds shocking but it will become an example for all future rioters…after all we have paid taxes and with that money all that items were purchased or made, what gives any one a right to deface or destroy it….. So my solution though extreme but effective…go ahead shoot those rioters ….this will shock but will surely deter future rioters…

 

My second objection was for the right to beliefs… pray tell me what right does any one have to use brute force method to make me believe his beliefs… this is not the democracy I learnt in school….he is basically transgressing into my personal space and trampling my fundamental rights by forcing his beliefs onto me….I do not need you to morally police me…I have achieved the age of 18 long time back so that gives me the right to vote…I have also achieved the age of 21 which gives me the right to marriage now if the law trusts me to make such vital decisions for my life who the hell is any one to tell me what is morally good or not…

 

I have been reading in news papers and watching on TV how some political activists on some special days like say the valentines day go and destroy cards and gifts shops further more they also enter the parks and beat up the couples and many a times force them into marriage…I remember reading somewhere that forcefully marrying any one is a crime yet I do not see how the government plans to stop this….the cops should actually counter such activists and the government should give the cops all the authority to make this happen….but in some cases there are reports of cops joining this sham, I recall a few months ago a bunch of such no good activists had entered a nightclub in Mangalore and destroyed property there, they also beat up some of the patrons by saying that all this is against their culture… ok boss…I agree it’s against your culture but not against mine…so go ahead and stay in your house and don’t come out and even if you come out remember, you do not have the right to harass any one because you believe in a few things that others do not…

 

I think shop and establishment owners should be allowed to keep shot guns and use them liberally on such miscreants only then will all this cease and only then will we be a truly democratic nation…the government can do a lil bit more and ban such outfits, after all they are just like terrorists who are disturbing the serenity of the society, they are the people who are stopping progress as the government starts spending in refurbishing or repairing or replacing the destroyed property, the money which could be used for progress ends up as fund fro repair and the time spent is a different tangent all together.

 

I think its time we wake up and realize that just as there is no reason good enough to justify murder (Self defense is not murder), there is no reason good enough to deface or destroy public property by rioting and also no reason is good enough to trample another’s fundamental rights on the basis of one’s beliefs.

 

 

JD

Accident, Assassination or EXECUTIVE DECISION

I have been thinking on this line for quite a few years now… What does a democratic government machinery do when its intelligence reports that an elected or un-elected leader is involved in a scam, they just cannot disclose it and send him to the jail rather as by doing so the normal public might grossly lose their confidence in the system…why …very simple its their favorite politician who looked so good turned out to be a scum so they would regret that decision of theirs and perhaps also lose confidence for good on the government machinery, so going ahead and telling ‘caught you’ is entirely out of question…but if we let him go Scot free he will do it again …perhaps something bigger or may be a go ahead and become a traitor…

 

Now here come the human values…if you have done something wrong you need to be punished …but here we are in a situation where “Bhala karo toh bura, na karo toh bura”… what can they do…simple EXECUTIVE DECISION, which is simply when the rest of the government decides to kill the leader and show it as an Accident or Assassination by some terror outfit…

 

Sounds pretty extreme…but think about it …if you are an elected leader how does some terrorist reach one with a gun or a suicide bomber come close to one to kill you despite the kind of security one enjoys…there has to be the rest of the government hood winking…

 

Secondly how can you meet with an accident when your security makes sure that you have the best transportation system without the scope of a malfunction…well simple boss the government is hood winking again…remember one of my previous post on perhaps how the president has no teeth…perhaps here is where he shows his sharp and strong teeth…he signs the EXECUTIVE DECISION and if he is the target the Armed Forces heads sign the decision…

 

See this is very beneficial…they make sure that he is not proved guilty in the courts any more cause they are already punished in a way…the public mourns his death and then forgets…but the faith in the system continues…

 

It’s a beautiful approach….and to think of it most of the politicians assassinated were involved in scams under litigation in the court of law or were involved in some mischief and they have been acquitted later on from the court of law basically given a clean chit…remember you cant punish twice…

 

Just a Conspiracy theory or a reality…

 

A Musing

JD

Janus Society…

 

I have always been thinking which of the 2 sexes is actually the stronger….after a lot of thinking I have concluded that it is the fairer sex which is also the stronger of the 2 . Lemme explain it was Charles Darwin who had once said “In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals because they succeed in adapting themselves best to their environment” which perfectly says as to why a Lady is better than a gentle man cause she is more adaptable and more accommodating than the rest of us…my postulate inched forward toward a theory when I read another quote which said that the most powerful man is one who wins a war without raising a sword and the women are amazingly good at that…they hardly ever need to raise a sword cause some chivalrous dumb brute will raise the sword for her and will either perish or slay the enemy…this is pure power when you make things happen but do not need to get your hands all messy….

 

I have been seeing this upper hand of women all through….my own sister had more freedom than me, and at many places women are preferred to us men…say when we were looking for a rented house most of the landlords preferred unmarried women/girls to us bachelors….so here is a splendid example of how the world is inclined to favor the lady…further more when I was in school I remember getting thrashed to extreme extents fro the tiniest of mistakes but the girl student was always handled with utmost care….this was when I started to get confused as to why are some people fighting for women’s equality when they are treated in such a superior way…the girls have also been mostly good at their academics which made me wonder why they needed a reservation of seats in the academic world, political world or which ever world…I always saw the women around me as strong individuals who could achieve the world…then why ask for such trivial favors…..

 

I remember my aunt who is a senior cop telling my mom….”Didi if someone tries to harass you just slap him hard enough for the crowd around you to notice it…he will be thrashed by them impromptu cause he firstly cant slap you back secondly the public will automatically assume that something is wrong with the guy and not the girl…”, this made me thinking where is this so called ‘mans world’ that we so often hear of….I could not find it…

 

But then  started reading stories of how women are being suppressed in certain segments of the society and slowly I learnt that those societies are the majority in number and the free, liberated and strong women I have always known are actually still a minority in India and many parts of the world…I was shocked as to how can someone harass such a lovely being who can be loved, respected, revered, cared for, feared may be sometimes hated perhaps but you cannot harm her… then what makes those men suppress them…it cannot be superiority because I sincerely find them to be equals and sometimes superior to us men…then what gives them the guts….cause even from a religious point of view each and every religion has given the women more social powers than men…Hinduism has even extended the woman the right to walk out of her marriage if she is not happy with it, but the man does not enjoy that privilege strictly religiously speaking, also no ceremony is possible without the presence of women…then how is it that they are getting oppressed

 

I was listening to the conversation between my mother and maid, she was someone who was part of the oppressed women…a husband who would beat her yada yada….but the root cause somewhere was the mother in law and not the husband…he was just the instrument…that is when something dawned upon me ….in many cases it’s the women suppressing the women and the men just play the tools for the suppression…see the mother of the boy many a times gets insecure after the boys wedding…you know the son is going to belong to another woman…here the family politics start and the oppression start and all the ugliness sets in and the unintelligible man who goes ahead and tries to take sides ends up as a tool in ne woman’s hands and becomes an instrument to oppression…this is one possible answer to my query where I always end up….

 

The topic of this article is Janus society …named after Janus the 2 faced god, and why not, we are after all living in a 2 faced society….on the face of it we live in a highly civilized society with utmost respect for human values and traditions, we are a specie with high tolerance towards another human being, a very secular, democratic and forward looking society but there also exists another very ugly face to our society where there is oppression, rape, hatred, intolerance both religious and racial, we are simultaneously living in a society which is also autocratic, dictatorial and very fundamentalist in its outlook…we are living in a society where in one hand we go ahead and worship the feminine form, celebrate her success and respect her and on the other we live in a society where she is regularly oppressed and made to think that being a woman is perhaps her biggest mistake…

 

What is the actual face of the society we are living in today …I am more than sure even the most intelligent mind in this world will not be able to answer this question…and how will he or she be able to when he is busy playing an instrument or busy playing with an instrument….we are living in a society which as on date does not have the time to stop and think as to how we can surgically remove the ugly face of this society so that the gangrene does not spread to the healthier and more handsome face….

 

Introspective

 JD

Men will always remain men

Just the other day a friend of mine was telling me Men will always be men…so I started thing what did he mean by ‘Men will always be men’…so like any intelligent net savvy human being I goggled out Men will be men and found somewhere close to 493,000,000 search results….so I decided that lemme do some introspection on this topic….

 

So I tried to recollect all the possible incidents where I or my friends/acquaintances have shown some typically boyish behavior…the first incident was of a classmate of mine he used to throw pencils on the floor and in that pretext would go ahead and search for the pencil…our was a co-ed school so we had girls wearing skirts in the class…or was the other incident where we in our canteen and discussing cars and bikes….or that incident when we were ogling at some beauties at the market place or that when we were making a racket at the pub the other night or when some of us bunked school to watch the India v/s Pakistan cricket match…aah now I get it…. it’s the  act where we guys behave like the anti-chick you know completely non gurly types where we lads just follow our Hormones…humm so Men will indeed be Men

 

So what stops the girls from being girls…if nothing stops them then its simple the basic premise that Men will be men and girls will be girls and so on are all over rated…now if all that is over rated why am I even wasting my time in writing a whole post on this ….i think I am finally losing it…its time I go and make sure I do not lose it and to make sure this is taken care of I need to log off….

 

Confused, Dazed & Harried

JD

The President…is he really the First citizen….

How does one define the first citizen, many would define the first citizen as the person with absolute executive, legal, military, constitutional and extra constitutional authority over the described area. So in lay man’s terms he is the most powerful man and his decisions are final and no further discussion is required. But is this exactly what is happening here in India I don’t think so… in India the President is just a ceremonial head but the executive decisions are vested on the Prime Minister…this has some problems….

 

The President in a way is equipped to take tough decisions as he knows that he can at most be in office for 2 terms so the idea of will I be re elected if I take this decision does not arise where as for the Prime Minister he can come into office for multiple terms without any restriction to the number of terms…so he will invariably be the person who would look at securing his seat first before the decision and the larger good…..

 

Now if we move back slightly in time about in the year 2002 when President Kalam had sent back a bill to the Lok Sabha with Changes, amendments and clarifications the government then just sent it back to him without accepting any of the suggestions and not giving any clarifications…and due to the laws of the land the president cannot send back the bill for a second time and he had to accept it except if he decides to exercise the “Pocket Vito”, well for the un informed Pocket Vito is the term when the President sits on the bill indefinitely…historically a couple of our honorable Presidents have exercised their this right but again its not an absolute vito after all…by looking at this statement he does not look like the first citizen at all to me rather as a Rubber Stamp without much of Constitutional Authority…

 

See what I am trying to say is that the constitution says a lot about his Judicial, Financial, Legislative and Executive powers but somewhere down the line the Prime Minister actually enjoys the maximum power and its not the President….

 

But somewhere down the line i feel that the authors of our constitution should have equipped this office of the President with more teeth than the weak and rotting Dentures they have provided….

 

These are entirely my view and you are always welcome to disagree to a part of or the whole of what I have said….after all we are in a democratic nation with the right of speech…..

 

 

JD